Hi, Tom,

Most people are asking for larger gutters around the tiles!  You can set it
the size in the code, but there isn't an easy way to change it...

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/extension/vectortiles/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wms/vector/PipelineBuilder.java#L80

I'm not sure why you are getting topological collapse - VTs uses the
Topology Preserving generalisation code (although it backs off to a simpler
method if there's a problem).

cf
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/extension/vectortiles/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wms/vector/PipelineBuilder.java#L297

cf
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/extension/vectortiles/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wms/vector/PipelineBuilder.java#L335

Thanks,
Dave

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Tom Cuthill <t...@yambay.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> It doesn’t appear that the guttering setting is entirely working for
> mapbox vector tiles (I’m using the 2.10 snapshot with the vector tiles
> extension).  Even though I set the gutter to zero, I still see negative
> pixel coordinates and coordinates greater than 256 when I look at the
> coordinates coming down from the server.  The tile size is set to 256.  Is
> there someway to turn guttering entirely off, so the features are clipped
> at the tile boundaries?
>
>
>
> Also, I found what appears to be a violation of the mapbox vector tile
> spec.  See  https://github.com/mapbox/vector-tile-spec/tree/master/2.1.
> When I look at the geojson for a tile I can see one feature with a small
> rectangle geometry which is sliver-like.  When I look at the same tile in
> its mapbox format, I get a polygon with the start position, then another
> position, and then the start position.  The thinness of the rectangle must
> collapse to the same pixel.  So basically what is being served down as a
> polygon is actually line-like (starting at a point, going to another point,
> and then going straight back to the same point).  To have a valid polygon
> there must be at least two positions between the start-end coordinate.
> I’ve had to filter these polygons out, since their ring orientation is
> undefined.
>
>
>
> Should I mention this problem as a bug??
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom Cuthill
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to