Andrea Aime wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:16 PM Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <mailto:jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote: >> Hi, >> I believe the issue has something to do with having towgs84 parameters >> together with the authority code AUTHORITY["EPSG","26917"]]. >> This rather new QGIS issue may help >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/34993#issuecomment-597583283 >> or >> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/cc02dc4397c7ec43ec4c4b842e5faabe16c54904 >> if you want to read more. >> Summary: >> - EPSG code is enough nowadays and there is no need to use towgs84 >> - It WKT has EPSG code and towgs84 GDAL thinks that CRS is not the standard >> EPSG CRS but something tailormade.
> TOWGS84 has been in the WKT for ages, breaking it now all of a sudden is poor > management IMHO, > we might change what newer GeoServer installations do now, but there is > plenty of older ones around > that won't get upgraded for a few years. Preserving backwards compatibility > is a must in my book, apparently, not in somebody elses.... I wonder how much it really breaks. The CRS is not recognized as EPSG:26917 and QGIS shows it as Unknown but the georeferencing solved by the parameters is the same and reprojection etc. should work just fine. -Jukka- _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this list: - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/ - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
