[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/24/2005 02:22:24 PM:
> Got it, I am simply concerned with manging things right now. I want > everyone to be able to work in the most efficient manner possible. I > understand that Gabriel is out of time for talking and process and is > now working on a branch somewhere? > > Here is my only question: > - How does my plans to separate all of the interfaces from main work > with you need to separate out coverage? If I understand this right, I think the two are almost completely independent. Most of the current Coverage stuff is already ported to GeoAPI interfaces (e.g., no interfaces in main). I don't think stripping out the interfaces from main will impact org.geotools.coverage.* at all. Even if it does have some minimal impact, we do intend to regularly merge changes in trunk into our branch. I vote +1 (for splitting coverage into its own module) of course, but I don't count. :) Bryce PS: w.r.t. JIRA issues and using subtasks: does anyone know if subtasks are heirarchical? Can I have subtasks of subtasks? No problem if no one knows, I'll just try it. I just want to avoid cluttering up JIRA with "organizational" mistakes from blind experimentation. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
