Bryce L Nordgren a écrit :
- How does my plans to separate all of the interfaces from main work
with you need to separate out coverage?
Geotools Coverage (as it stand today) is completly independent of any
Geotools interfaces to be separated. Coverage currently implements only
GeoAPI 2.0 interfaces. We may implement GeoAPI pending interfaces in the
near future as an experimental ISO 19123 implementation, but it still
GeoAPI only.
By the way Alessio, I forgot to tell that I commited the remaining ISO
19123 interfaces that you sent me a while ago. All ISO 19123 interfaces
should now be there. Next step will be to discuss and see which changes
may be needed. I have not yet generated any javadoc for the GeoAPI
pending directory however, but I have a Maven 2 build running :)
The only possible issue is that Coverage should extends Feature. But we
are not yet there, and we can wait that the Feature interfaces are ready
before to investigate this issue.
I believe that moving Coverage in its own module is a relatively
low-risk task, since it is already quite independent.
Martin.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
