Crossley, Jesse wrote:
aside to whom?
heh - to any SLD RWG people on the list.
The two public sld schemas change the name of the XML element they used
to capture this concept.
I was wondering if they had made up their mind for SLD 1.1.
from a GeoAPI stand point, i would like to continue to support the
org.opengis.sld.*Symbol objects more than the
*.go.display.primitive.*Symbolizer thingys. i most definitely intend to
keep using Symbols, but i may be able to let Symbolizers fall by the
wayside.
Understood (from your earlier comments as well).
from a geotools stand point, well, i'm not fit to answer that one.
i would think you guys would want to sort of gloss over the whole
Graphic side of things and stick to Features (and the coming Coverages).
Actually that is part of what geotools is after, Martin is looking to
implement a bit of Go-1.
Aside: (to you this time) Incase you don't here so often enough having a
cache of Graphic(s)
as the result of applying a SLD+Feature is not that bad an idea ;-) You
simply have to wait
for us to catch up to the need for these ideas... (as I recall we could not
contribute much when you were putting together Graphic and friends).
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
