Bryce L Nordgren a écrit :
> I guess I'd be in favor of retaining this package as one-or-more
> "extensions".  (Note this should not prevent us from forking it to JScience
> under a different license if they want it.)  My main concern is that we
> retain a package within Geotools within which common
> geospatially-calculable quantities can collect.

It sound good to me. So in addition of copying it to JScience, we can also 
migrate it to a new 
Geotools module (yet to be determined). I will left it in its current place in 
the main time, until 
we get a clearer picture about where to put it (probably after both our 
coverage branch merge and 
the next JScience release with those classed bundled in it).

        Martin.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to