On 7/31/06, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Turton ha scritto: > > >> > > That would be fine. The filter stuff is still work in progress but I > > think the ability to do highlighting and selection is useful. > > Good. What surprises me a little is that apparently there's a full set of > gt2 filter clones in the geovista packages and I don't understand why. > > Second consideration: is it ok to have geovista packages in gt2? > Wouldn't it be better to rename them to org.geotools something? > I think keeping the headers should be enough (provided that there are headers > stating the code was created in the geovista project). >
those filters shouldn't be in the module, they aren't current;y used and are for use in geovista studio only feel free to delete them. With any luck I should have time and a good enough connection to do an update and look at the code. Ian -- Ian Turton http://www.geotools.org http://pennspace.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
