Cool, sounds good, go ahead an apply the patch.

-Justin

Cory Horner wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> 
>> The patch looks good. A couple of comments:
>>
>> 1. The result sets created in teh method are never closed. This was like
>> this before I know, might be a good time to fix it. Not a big issue
>> though.
>>  
>>
> done.
> 
>> 2. The pattern matching that is done to find the sequence from the
>> system tables. Is there any chance it could pick up the wrong sequence
>> Like for instance if i have two columns in the same table, one named
>> 'foo', and one named 'foobar', that both have a sequence defined on
>> them, it might be able to pick up the sequence for foobar when searching
>> for foo. Can we make the comparison a bit tighter?
>>  
>>
> Good point... the "last resort" (find the last row) method is a lot
> safer than possibly getting the wrong sequence.  80% of the time we will
> get a postgres generated sequence, so let's do a case-insensitive match
> on "table_column_seq", rather than "%table_column%".
> 
> Thanks!
> Cory.
> 
> !DSPAM:1004,45242866159287785049143!
> 


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to