Forgot this one... man, your feedback was quite big :-p Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Hi Andrea,
> GetDiff - GetTransaction Request option > It would be *nice* if the result was *not* a GetFeatures extensions but > instead the exact Transaction request documented required to make the > change; no messing around or inventing new xml schema is requried here. My take on this is that no client has the infrastructure in place to parse a Transaction request, they only have generating code (which may well be just a string catenation)... We could have multiple output format for diff, and "rollback-transaction" could be one created just for the sake of doing rollback with a diff + transation, but... see my next comment > This is consistent with Galdos cascading WFS-T approach and would be a > *great* benefit for keeping servers in sync. > (Please consider this idea). I don't follow you... why Galdos matters in a GetDiff request? > Rollback - don't do it, use GetDiff I disagree here for two reasons: * doing a rollback in the server is very quick, it's just a matter of a couple of queries (much faster, the more the bigger you revert is) * if the rollback is big, the transaction request to do the actual work can be a huge gml document. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
