I installed the version with native code ... you got a geotools test 
case capturing the reported problem?
Jody
> Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> Martin if the developers guide says 1.1.3 (and we send out an email) 
>> you can make that assumption...
>>
>> I tried updating the developers guide in Monday's meeting - can you 
>> review the page and send out
>> an email if you are happy?
>>  
>>
> Ah, so someone using 1.1.3 has managed to get the tests to pass? A 
> couple months ago I upgraded to 1.1.3, watched the uDig reprojection 
> code die, and quickly reverted (it seemed that some important classes 
> had been removed).  So 1.1.3 actually works :)?  (I kept getting the 
> no "mediaLib accelerator wrapper classes" exceptions, just like the 
> guy on geotools-users with the "Another JAI question" post).
>
> Thanks,
> Cory.
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to