Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >>> Version was part of the GeoTools 2.0 feature model (and was removed >>> as it was unused), and it is part of the general OGC feature model. >>> So add it back in now that you have a use for it. >> Jody, if I start to implement the thing this week, it'll be against gt2 >> 2.3 or at best 2.4 (the latter being unlikely, I don't see a Geoserver >> come out against 2.4 before March 2007, althought this is just my gut >> feeling). Geotools 2.0 is something distant and dangerous for my >> geoserver codebase (aka, it'll probably tear it apart during the port...) > Andrea can you "make the cut" with a suggestion before 2.3.0 goes out > the door? That seems to be the best of both worlds: > I assume: > GeoTools changes: > #1 Feature.getVersion(): String, default implementation returns null > (for unknown) > #2 Fix up the Transform to output the version if it is non null
Yeah, this seems a good solution, see also my other mail on why I realized having version as an xml attribute is better than having it as an xml entity (a FeatureAttribute value, that is). Going to make a change request. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
