cool. just a couple notes on that. An area is simply a "way" that connects to itself to form a closed polygon. There "area" object in the database will be deprecated. The docs on the wiki were out of date, fixed that.
For transactions, an atomic PUT of multiple objects is being looked into. For rollbacks, it will probably be done by date on an object. There might also be a desire to rollback an entire bbox defined region, though this complicates things through cascading effects into outside regions. ----- Original Message ---- From: Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Raj Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jo Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Geoserver-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Geotools-Devel list <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:42:34 PM Subject: Re: [WFSBasic.Users] [Geotools-devel] Versioning WFS-T and protocol extensions [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Here's what the current usage profile of the OpenStreetMap API. It's > worked extremely well, and been implemented by many clients. ... funny... I did more or less the same summary this morning after reading the API and sql informations: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/Versioning+WFS+-+OpenStreetMap Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
