I kind of agree with Chris. To do transactions right moves out of Simple land. Once you want to update or edit a data set you need to know all kinds of things about the structure of that data. Not to mention the other issues. Maybe openstreetmap people could offer some advice? --- Raj
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Jo Walsh wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:37:16PM -0500, Chris Holmes wrote: >> I would love it if we could include our ideas on transactions and >> versioning and the like in WFS-Simple, but unfortunately I do fear >> that >> when you get in to transactions, authentication, and versioning >> you're >> no longer in 'simple' land (indeed I myself might argue against their >> place in a simple spec). > > Then 'Simple' is kind of a misnomer. 'Basic' was the original name, > right? I would have thought being able to write a feature to a web > feature service was a fairly basic operation ;P > > You don't need much of the rest of WFS, right, to do Transactions? > Like Filter support and POST queries, GML comprehension and emission, > all these non-Simple things. The question is not "why should it be > WFS-T" but "why shouldn't it also be this other, kind of WFS-like > thing" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
