Justin Deoliveira wrote: > So looking down the pipe at a major api shift ( fm ), we are already > planning for another ( data )? How do we sell this api change? From a > client point of view I can see the advantage, but what does it buy > others besides another layer of abstraction. > This is doing the prep work for the one major api shift (fm); one of the problems you poked a hole in was the use of typeName, Jesse is finding problems on the other side of things (info, accuracy, handling events). GridCoverage people have also been asking how they can be integrated ... > From a GeoServer point of view the only gain I would see is if the grid > coverage guys see this as a useful abstraction. I don't know enough > about that part of the code base to comment really. Hopefully simboss > can provide some feedback as well. > Justin perhaps you want to look at the GridCoverage example available in the code base - the same one I am asking simboss for feedback on. Earlier feedback the better.
Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
