> > Justin, > I fully agree with you, but I don't understand enough the current > implementation to see a way out. So, if you have ideas on how to shield > renderer from the implementation, I'm all for it. I'm just unable to > devise such a solution. You can see my patch as a band-aid to avoid > getting 2.4 out of the door with performance regressions in the same use > cases 2.3.x handled. Yup, I fully agree and I think the patch is a good idea. Just something I think we should keep in mind. Especially with the feature model waiting in the wings and property accessors that can handle real xpath become more widely used. > > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
-- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
