Justin Deoliveira wrote: > If you choose the Java 5 option, could you also please vote on whether > you would like to make the change to FeatureType (see note below). > > Also note that if the Java 5 route is chosen it will require that we > release 2.4 against java 5, and not just 2.5. > > A. Java 5 Option: > > AttributeType: > * rename "getName()" to "getLocalName()" > * rename "getType()" to "getBinding()" > > Feature: > * retype "getBounds()" to "ReferencedEnvelope" > * rename "getDefaultGeometry()" to "getPrimaryGeometry()" > > FeatureType: > * rename "getDefaultGeometry()" to "getPrimaryGeometry()" > > ** Note: The change on FeatureType is technically not needed with type > narrowing, but we may wish to rename it to maintain consistency with the > change to Feature. > The Java 5 option is way better :-)
I asked previously, but perhaps it was lost, about renaming AttributeType.getName() to AttributeType.name(). Perhaps it is a stupid idea, I just like representing derived quantities without java bean naming conventions... Thanks for presenting the options so clearly Justin. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
