Jody Garnett wrote: > Reminds me I need to add "events" as something I am willing to give up > (although Jesse will kill me). I put in a method for > featureCollection.collection() - is that suitable? > One more thing I am willing to give up (if we have to), is using FeatureCollection as the result of getFeatures(). If we really need a more simple data access api thing, then we should not complicate the definition of a FeatureCollection (in an ISO19107) sense with our implementation details.
I would even go so far as to say that ISO19107 FeatureCollection could be reserved for the in memory case you mention :-( We should just not pretend that we can make a data access API that can do more then iterate/visit through features. Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
