Jody Garnett ha scritto: > And thus the parts start to come back together ... >> I think you have communicated your intention just fine... its just >> that from my point of view while this seems like a very noble and >> lofty goal i dont think its very practical. Anyways... my two cents. > I am in agreement with you; and if that is not our goal (as a project) > then I would like to leave the word "FeatureCollection" out of the picture. > > I do happen to think ISO19107 FeatureColletion will be valuable - but if > we do not have resources/mandate/will to implement this right now (or > ever) then I would like us to do exactly that ... not implement geoapi > FeatureCollection.
+1000 on this one. But can we keep on calling it FeatureCollection? It would significantly reduce the client code breakage. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
