Chris Holmes a écrit :
> And then to Getools lists, what is the nD coverage interface that you're
> working against?  Have you come up with something new?  Has there been
> discussion on geotools and a concrete proposal?  I assume that PostGRID
> is then implementing an interface that other implementations can back?
> GCE has been deprecated, are you guys working on a replacement?

We don't have any new interaces yet, neither on PostGrid or NetCDF side. 
PostGrid come with a bunch of interfaces, but I consider them as internal 
working (this is an other reason why this project was not developped on 
Geotools), so really you can ignore everything in this project (as far as API 
exposed to developers is concerned).

NetCDF is developped on top of javax.imageio API, even for the 3D part (I'm 
using the standard "band select" API for that) so there is no new API there 
neither. There is some convenience tools for ImageReader developers, but anyone 
can ignore them.

The only thing really new is a schema proposal for geographic metadata. This is 
more a XML schema than a Java API. This part is standardized in "GML in JPEG 
2000" OGC specification (but still I need to align it better with the standard).

We will need to revisit the GridCoverage2DReader API, but we have not yet 
reached this part. So yes we would like to work on a GridCoverageExchange 
replacement, but we have not started this work yet.

So in summary:

   * You can ignore completly the "postgrid" project. This is an experimental
     implementation. It doesn't propose any API at this stage, and I do not
     expect it to become an API in any foreseable future (the API would be
     whatever will replace GridCoverageExchange; the PostGrid API is just
     implementation details).

   * The only thing new in "coverageio" and "coverageio-netcdf" unsupported
     modules at this time is the XML schema for geographic metadata in rasters,
     in the spirit of "GML in JPEG 2000" OGC specification. There is no new
     Java API at this time. There is a bunch of support classes for
     implementors, but anyone is free to ignore them.

   * I already posted an email about this "geographic metadata" stuff a
     few weeks ago and got no comments. Prolably my email didn't gave
     enough details. I will post an other one soon.



     Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to