Is there a prameter we can use on the GridFormat so we can set to drag 
images into memory again?
In general 2.4 is way faster - in specifics JPEG is always a problem 
since you need to read the whole
file all the time.

Cheers,
Jody

Andrea Antonello wrote:
> After a chat in irc I understood that the trunc udig doesn't keep jpegs
> in memory, which doesn't give out of memory problems, but for sure give
> running out of lifetime problems. This is related to the new geotools
> and I assume this was a choice, since geotiff and other formats now
> are greatly enhanced. However I think that the jpeg thing should be
> thought over again (asking for ideas), because photos are usually best
> compressed in that format and they take a lifetime to load at every
> small pan that is made, even at deep zoom, where the prior (RC11) cached
> version takes nothing to draw again.
>
> Ciao
> Andrea
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to