>>> >> Yes... actually i would almost like to kill operations in that it is not >> referenced from anywhere. Not kill the interface. My reasoning is that >> we dont currently have a use case for them. Jody keeps mentioning some >> coverage stuff... but noone really seems to be chomping at the bit for >> it. So if it were up to me I would kill any reference to Operations from >> the rest of the model, and add it when someone actually needs it. >> > We don't need any explicit reference; they show up as a > PropetyDescriptor and that is it. A "invoke( Name, Object[] ) would be > nice but > we can leave it for later.
So what about AttributeType#getOperations()? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
