Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > > in the logging proposal we have a -1 vote. Ok, time to test > the proposal procedures for this case too :) > My understanding is that the person voting -1 is going to come up with a counter proposal. This may take the form of revising your existing proposal, or may a clear alternative. > What is the procedure to handle a -1? I kind of remember > the concerns must be addressed if possible, and if not > a second vote is required where the -1 is no more a blocker > for the proposal provided it gets more positive votes... > or something like that, but I can't find > anything detailed in the wiki page: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/GeoTools+change+proposal > We had discussions to that effect yes; but I only ever managed to write a few things down in the developers guide (and asked for a review). > From the wiki page it seems a PMC member can veto any change > without possibility for the rest of the PMC to make a proposal > pass anyways. Is it so? > I think the -1 acts as a veto; but there is an associated cost (a counter proposal). Cheers, Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
