Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Understood Andrea; I will update the proposal page based on Martin's > recent email and we can move on. It looks like the proposal has enough > votes to move forward.
Yep. I looked at the updated page and I still have two considerations to make: * Logging needs the log factory. What holds it? If GeoTools we need a GeoTools.getLogFactory() method so that Logging can grab it. If Logging we need a Logging.setLogFactory(xxx) that GeoTools will delegate to * CommonHandler and co are @since 2.4. Can't we just delete them instead of deprecating? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
