Jody Garnett a écrit :
> The question still stands - as far as I can tell jsr108 is a jar martin
> makes up for us because he is kind. We could probably
> lose jsr 108 and switch to JScience but we will need to wait to hear
> from Martin.
It was planned since a long time - I'm also on the JSR-275 mailing list. But we
need to:
1) First, switch GeoAPI to JSR-275.
2) Next, refactor GeoTools in order to get it compiling
(some class name changed).
3) Finally, change some code logic. The way JSR-275 computes Converter is
the opposite of the way JSR-108 did (can't give more details right now;
would need to go back to the API). Both way are legitimate, they are
just two different point of views.
So this is on my stack with "svn cleanup" and "module renaming". Not sure in
which order I will do all those.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
