Hey gabriel (and anyone else interested),
Do you think we should go with "ArcSdeXXX" or "ArcSDEXXX" for class
names? Also, when should that prefix be applied, and when shouldn't it?
For example, we've got the following classes:
FidReader.java
SdeRow.java
Should these be "ArcS{de,DE}FidReader" and "ArcS{de,DE}Row"?
My preference:
* I don't care one way or the other on the "ArcSDE" vs "ArcSde" thing,
just that we do it consistently (hrm, why do I feel so anal about that?
I'm not sure, perhaps I need therapy...).
* I feel like "utility" or "helper" classes that are internal to the
API could live without the prefix, but that all outward-facing classes
should have the prefix.
Your thoughts?
--saul
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
