Martin wrote: > Jody suggested me an alternative proposal last Friday. I documented it at > this page: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Module+renaming > > The "Original proposal" section is what we did. The "Alternative > proposal" section is Jody's proposal, which make sense.
If you ask, here are my 2c on the proposal: - If there is at least one spot where the correctly named snapshot jars can be found and this spot is announced on the GeoTools download page I'm fine with anything you do internally, so I'd be fine with the original approach as well if i saves you lots of work. - I'd rather prefer a simple "gt-" over "gt-plg-"/"gt-lib-" etc. The one reason is that it is simply shorter, the other is that modules sometimes switch between supported and unsupported and I wonder if this would cause a renaming? I wouldn't like a renaming of jars in this case. If there is ONE way to distinguish between core, plugins and extensions I'm fine. It might just be the module matrix on the home page, it might be directory structure or it might be the prefixes. These are just preferences. On the technical front it is your choice. I wonder what other users think... -- Matthias Basler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
