Matthias Basler a écrit :
> - I'd rather prefer a simple "gt-" over "gt-plg-"/"gt-lib-" etc. The one
> reason is that it is simply shorter, the other is that modules sometimes
> switch between supported and unsupported and I wonder if this would cause a
> renaming? I wouldn't like a renaming of jars in this case.
A switch between supported and unsupported would cause a JAR renaming.
We can drop the "-lib-" or "-ext-" parts. I'm not sure they worth their weight
neither. We still need to way to advise which modules are supported and which
ones are not, but maybe javadoc would be suffisient...
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
