Gabriel Roldán wrote: > On Wednesday 28 May 2008 09:51:48 pm Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Hi Gabriel; looking forward to your review ... >> > okay, other than the fids Set seeming not to be initialized anywhere, > BatchFeatureEvent seems reasonably, but still is quite hard to assess without > that memorydatastore test updated to use it? or is someone actually using it? > I can't see it referenced anywhere. > I wanted a review before writing the test case. I know it is what was described on the proposal page; but still it is a little different seeing it in code. >> Gabriel I have reports of two things from testing: >> - the ArcSDEDataStore (in single connection mode) is working very well; >> except.... >> - if there are 2 users, the thing mess up a little (two different users >> signed on to different machines!) >> >> Apparently "things mess up a little" ends up being exceptions when >> editing; and sometimes at rendering; I will try and ask for specifics. >> Jody >> > > Interesting... I assume this is for a versioned table? do you have a stack > trace? > I don't think they are using versioned tables. And I will get the stack trace to you today. > wondering how to reproduce in a test case... may be creating two different > ArcSDEDataStore instances fed with different pools hitting the same > machine... > That was going to be what I recommended as well. Sounds expensive to test. Are you running ArcSDE locally now? Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
