On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 08:37 -0700, Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > I'm jumping into the middle of this conversation, but I wanted to > clarify something. I don't know if it will add to the discussion, but > I hope it will. > > The Geoid is not a mathematical figure like an ellipsoid, so I don't > think you can really refer to "conversion" equations.
What "conversion" equations? I was discussing how the models work which is exactly the point of an analytic coverage. Everywhere in a domain (all of long,lat) you can get a result (height of the standard potential value). This is all within a single model, not comparing two or converting between two. --adrian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
