Andrea Aime wrote:
> Yes, I like the proposed solution better. I believe the original method
> names were shortened to save space.
> Anyways, that's a GeoAPI change. I'm favourable, but not very keen to
> work on it as you may already know.
That is why you have friends; just got the email now - I will make the
change and talk to you before committing. Are you okay with building
geoapi locally?
>> Still it may be better to review the xpath notation; perhaps
>> something like ff.property(".") is more explicit?
> Oh yes, this one I like, xpath consistent, familiar to anyone that
> has any familiarity with a file system too. Actually it seems the
> correct way to do even from an OGC point of view.
Agreed all around.
>> Thanks Andrea you have indeed found a flaw; but not one that we
>> totally need to fix until Gabriel has the complex datastore stuff
>> working again.
> Eh, not exactly. While working on performance I noticed that all the
>
>> Right on Andrea; I remember this (along with the method names) as
>> something we were going to revisit after we had some hands on
>> experience. So do we feel experienced now?
>
> Well, frankly I haven't worked much on gt2 trunk so I don't feel very
> "experienced", but I have some time to fix this stuff now.
> Tomorrow may be too late.
Okay let us move; I cannot send email or commit very well during the day
(maybe I can configure svn to like firewalls). This may be an evening
project for me.
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
