Sure, I will run todays meeting. Are we expecting a vote on this proposal today? Or just presenting it?
Jody Garnett wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >>> I think my list is down to: >>> - Sort out how unsupported modules are handled (I owe everyone a >>> proposal for Monday's meeting) >>> - Go through the user guide examples (they user list has kindly been >>> providing feedback). >> Is there anything I can do to help here? > Can you run todays GeoTools meeting (I am on a customers site and cannot > attend). I want to make sure the handling of unsupported modules is > sorted out; we decided on a direction last meeting and I was supposed to > write up a proposal. >> I can probably help with the maven releasish type stuff. One thing we >> did recently in GeoServer to include extension modules in the release >> was add some release specific profiles to include / exclude certain >> modules. I wonder if that will work here. > Indeed that is what my proposal for todays meeting is about: > - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Handling+of+Unsupported+Modules >>> We went through most of the major issues with respect to headers and >>> licensing the last couple releases - but it would be double check >>> known issues on this page: >>> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GeoTools+Provenance+Review > Anything on the list of "known issues" is fair game; help would be > greatly appreciated. > Jody -- Justin Deoliveira Software Engineer, OpenGeo http://opengeo.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
