Adrian Custer wrote: > Those are my changes done yesterday. I had no idea you had guidelines > now for the UserManual. > I had them up for a while; mostly when I started to keep my head straight. I updated them this afternoon to reflect what was actually happening. The general idea is the user guide has examples; the javadocs have definitions. The rest is kind of details (details that keep it consistent of course; but details none the less). > I separated out the different kinds of plugins into separate pages. Do > you really want to mix I/O plugins with processing plugins? That's what > you had before---it seemed confusing to me so I tried to clarify the > difference. > I suppose I do not understand the difference yet; to developers they all appear as new coverages formats do they not?
Thinking ... my main motivation is to group plugin documentation as child pages of the module they contribute functionality to; perhaps this could be done with tags? That would allow us to cover the case where when module actually contributes several factories... What do you think? Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
