Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Just a final chance to point out that codehaus is an option and would
>> minimize the amount of password stuff project members need to figure
>> out. Also the access to maven repo space is pretty sweet. I assume this
>> was discussed in the meeting - I will check the logs.
>
> Nope, it wasn't. I personally would like better moving to codehaus as
> well, if nothing else because of familiarity (and because, based on
> GeoServer experience, it works, they failed us only once in two years
> if I remember properly).
>
> However, that would have raised the usual discussions, since everybody
> is ok with OSGEO, I'm not going to look for further troubles.
I had a preference for OSGEO a few months ago, but today I'm more tempted to
wait because I don't know yet how an eventual DVS would fit in the picture.
Consequently I'm completly fine with either codehaus or osgeo for the subversion
repository. Actually I agree that codehaus can be a good option for the reasons
said by Jody. If it has Andrea's preference as well, then we can go with that.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
