Hi PMC guys, as far as I understood we should try and get on with either moving to codehaus or moving to osgeo. What should we do now? Should we start voting on these two options?
Simone. On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think someone on PSC has to declare "motion approved" and then I'll > swing into motion on the OSGeo side. > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Simone Giannecchini > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hy guys, >> just out of curiosity, where we are wt with this repo thing? >> >> Simone. >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I agree with this Paul. As java folks we are already somewhat considered >>> as lepers... going with our own svn solution like codehaus would just >>> add fuel to the fire :) >>> >>> -Justin >>> >>> Paul Ramsey wrote: >>>> As an OSGeo project, you should really be using OSGeo >>>> infrastructure... there's not really a compelling reason not to. >>>> >>>> P. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Martin Desruisseaux >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Andrea Aime a écrit : >>>>>>> Just a final chance to point out that codehaus is an option and would >>>>>>> minimize the amount of password stuff project members need to figure >>>>>>> out. Also the access to maven repo space is pretty sweet. I assume this >>>>>>> was discussed in the meeting - I will check the logs. >>>>>> Nope, it wasn't. I personally would like better moving to codehaus as >>>>>> well, if nothing else because of familiarity (and because, based on >>>>>> GeoServer experience, it works, they failed us only once in two years >>>>>> if I remember properly). >>>>>> >>>>>> However, that would have raised the usual discussions, since everybody >>>>>> is ok with OSGEO, I'm not going to look for further troubles. >>>>> >>>>> I had a preference for OSGEO a few months ago, but today I'm more tempted >>>>> to >>>>> wait because I don't know yet how an eventual DVS would fit in the >>>>> picture. >>>>> >>>>> Consequently I'm completly fine with either codehaus or osgeo for the >>>>> subversion >>>>> repository. Actually I agree that codehaus can be a good option for the >>>>> reasons >>>>> said by Jody. If it has Andrea's preference as well, then we can go with >>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>> challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>> world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>> challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Justin Deoliveira >>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Eng. Simone Giannecchini >> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >> Owner - Software Engineer >> Via Carignoni 51 >> 55041 Camaiore (LU) >> Italy >> >> phone: +39 0584983027 >> fax: +39 0584983027 >> mob: +39 333 8128928 >> >> >> http://www.geo-solutions.it >> http://www.geo-solutions.it/simone.giannecchini >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> > > -- ------------------------------------------------------- Eng. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://www.geo-solutions.it/simone.giannecchini http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
