I can't speak for Andrea but I think it makes a lot of sense. The CQL syntax in GeoServer is something that has gotten good feedback from users. A big +1 on adding more functionality.
So as I understand it TXT is sort of a replacement for CQL, but far more functional? Jody Garnett wrote: > This seems fine Mauricio; +1 > > Thanks for the work on this one; Andrea how do you feel about wider use > of this TXT syntax in say GeoServer or the dynamic icon work? It does > bring us the extensions to CQL allowing the use of FeatureId now. > > Jody > > Mauricio Pazos wrote: >> Hi list: >> I have finished the module documentation, it is the the following link >> >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/CQL+Parser >> >> Someone of PMC members was waiting this documentation to vote. To see >> proposal vote status, take a look at: >> >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter >> >> >> >> cheers >> >> Mauricio Pazos >> www.axios.es >> >> > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
