On Monday 24 November 2008 14:10:35 Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I can't speak for Andrea but I think it makes a lot of sense. The CQL > syntax in GeoServer is something that has gotten good feedback from > users. A big +1 on adding more functionality. Thanks (It's nice to hear you) > > So as I understand it TXT is sort of a replacement for CQL, but far more > functional? CQL is a OGC specification and it could be hard to remplace. I think TXT will be a Friend of CQL, that we could use to solve some practical problems, doing easy to express some queries. Nowadays, TXT parser generates all filters provided by FilterFactory2 and improve the language with new predicate to do easy to write complex query. The idea was avoid the limitation of CQL specification. Thus, TXT offers us a new door to develop new requirement and improve the language. > > Jody Garnett wrote:
-- Mauricio Pazos Director www.axios.es ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
