Andrea Aime wrote: > Mauricio Pazos ha scritto: >> >> Adrian, What do you think about the new options?. Hmm, I must have missed a round. Mauricio, you don't want my opinion on something this trivial. Pick one, do a quick google search on it to see if our users will be able to find our docs if we put them up, commit, close your bug, and have a delicious beverage. If you ask for my opinon, we'll be here 'till 2009.
My temptations are all wrong and self-conflicting. My first tempation would be to mix case, e.g. eCQL, extCQL but that probably doesn't match the *QL pattern. My second temptation would be towards EXTCQL to keep the alliteration to the TXT effort that spawned it, but that's getting too long. i.e. We could waste a lot of time asking Adrian for opinion. ECQL works better than CQL+ for searches and urls. all the best, --adrian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
