Hi Landon, Comments inline.
Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > I'd like to add the Maven "module" structure for my unsupported GPX2 > module to the GeoTools SVN. My eventual goal is to get it included in > the Geotools build. I've been building things from my own SVN, but > that isn't much like a good community player. I figure it is time to > learn how to play by the Geotools rules. :] > > I read over the section of the developer guide that talks about > setting up a module today. I was about to start setting up the Maven > folder structure on the SVN when I realized we are in the middle of > the transition to the OSGeo infrastructure. Would this be a bad time > to set up my module in the SVN? Should I wait until the transition is > over? I think things have landed so it should be ok to add your module. > > I also had a couple of questions about the module set-up. This page of > the developer guide: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/5.3+Module+Directory+Structure > > does not mention the "unsupported" category. However, based on the > structure of the existing SVN, I'm guessing this is the category for > my GPX2 module. So the path to my module would look like this: You may find this useful as well: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Handling+of+Unsupported+Modules > > modules/unsupported/gpx2 But this is correct, that is where the module would live. > > Is that correct? > > Also, do I set up the content of the POM xml file, or is that > automatically generated by Maven? Nope, you have to create it. I suggest you just grab another on of the unsupported pom.xml's, copy it into gpx2 and update accordingly. It is mostly boiler plate stuff. > > Is there a standard review.apt file for code released under the LGPL? > > As you can see, I'm rather lazy and in the need of a good Maven > tutorial. :] Please bear with me as I move from my simple Eclipse/Ant > system to something more complicated like Maven. :] No problem, feel free to ask questions. We have dealt with the pain of learning maven so there is no reason for you to go through the same agony ;). > > Landon > > P.S. - If I set up my module layout and zip it up, would someone be > willing to take a quick look at it before I try to commit it to SVN? I > want to make sure I get it correct. Sure thing. I would be happy to review it for you. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
