Hey All,

On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:28 +0100, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> FYI, GeoNetwork 3.0 which is under development will implement ebRIM
> and will heavily based on spring (which can be considered somewhat an
> alternative to ejb3) and hibernate.

Yes, everyone seems to be moving to ebRIM since the OGC has. 

MDweb is hoping to move that way this year as well though I am not sure
of the detailed plans. The MDweb2 metamodel predates the rise of ebRIM
at the OGC. However, because MDweb2 is based on a metamodel, those
working on the system do expect any great difficulties in reformulating
that metamodel to handle ebRIM. 

> Just so that you know, GeoNetwork is the
> de-facto standard for CSW since it is implemented almost everywhere,
> even, if my memory serves me right, behind the INSPIRE GeoPortal :-).

Metadata cataloging of Geospatial resources has been such a widespread
effort that it is unlikely that there is any overall standard except in
very specific information communities. Different information
communities, in different domains, language groups, or partnerships,
have all arrived at different standards. GeoNetwork seems to be a
powerful solution, and quite popular around the OGC, but there are
likely to be others.

MDweb has been growing in its own community, which I believe was
originally centered around hydrology in Africa. This year, MDweb is
being evaluated in a twenty country, thirty partner effort, to assess
its potential as a foundation of Europe's biodiversity cataloging. So
MDweb may well become a standard tool of that particular community.
MDweb will certainly play a role in what should be a diverse, exciting,
interoperable, European geo-information infrastructure.

--adrian


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to