|
Gabriel, That sounds 100% fine to me. --saul Gabriel Roldan wrote: btw, I'm moving the ArcSDEPyramid and ArcSDEPyramidLevel classes from the org.geotools.arcsde.gce package to the org.geotools.arcsde.gce.imageio package as I think they better fit there. Otherwise we end up with cyclic dependencies on those packages and the org.geotools.arcsde.gce package interface seems overloaded with unneeded clutter to me, where it should only contain the Format and Coverage2DReader implementations, and the last one being package visible, so the org.geotools.arcsde.gce package interface is just the Format class. Does it seem good?Cheers, gabriel On Friday 23 January 2009 15:55:46 Gabriel Roldan wrote: |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
