Thanks Micheal,
I didn't have a look at the antrl stuff yet, but it sounds ok to me.

Did you already think about syntax indeep?
I would love to follow the footsteps of a well tested one:
http://grass.itc.it/grass64/manuals/html64_user/r.mapcalc.html

What do you think?

Andrea


On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Michael Bedward
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrea
>
>> For me ok, this week any day at that hour would be ok.
>
> Super - perhaps we can try tomorrow...
>
>> One question, did you take into a account to use jscience for that? I
>> gave it a quick look once and had the feeling that they had a parser.
>
> I have only looked in a most superficial way.  For the app that I am
> working on at the moment I wanted a scripting language that was very
> simple for the user, but possibly extendible.  I also thought it might
> be easier to join the parser to JAI if I had control of the grammar
> from the ground up.
>
> Also, I'm enjoying playing with ANTLR :-)
>
>> PS: I would also be interested to be added to the project, if that is
>> ok for you.
>
> I've just added you as a member.  I haven't really looked at the
> difference between project owner and member features on Google Code
> yet - it may be that we all need to be owners (?)
>
> Michael
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to