Rob Atkinson wrote: > (warning - rhetorical question) Why do we want a SimpleFeature at all? > It seems to me to be partly to implement an implied contract with all > the previous users of Feature, not because there is any intrinsic > reason that any of the previous uses actually needs to have the > constraints of Simpleness enforced.
You like complex and slow features, I like simple and fast ones. To each one is own ;-) Corner me in a situation where only slow and bloated stuff is possible, and I'll loose interest in the project (seriously). Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
