Gabriel Roldan wrote:
> guys, I'm more than willing to try and provide my view from the past 
> experience with the overrides and all but I guess I'm quite loosing the 
> point of the discussion, sorry.
> 
> Ben can you rephrase what the actual problem is with the bindings please?
> 
> 
Afaik there are two points of discussion still open.

1) Encoding the property type that does not extend the 
FeaturePropertyType without implementing custom bindings for each 
property type

2) How to arrange the xml encoder configuration. Should it be rolled 
into a single configuration, or should there be two separate 
configurations, one complex and one simple.


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to