Justin wrote (in a Jira comment):
> On a related note? How goes the work on the GML3 bindings in geotools?
I am back working on it today. I have a working solution for the
substitution group problem, but I still have some odd behaviour for some
other complex properties. I need to confirm that the test objects are
built correctly, and perhaps tweak some of the bindings.
I do have one question for you: if I have a multivalued property that
has several values for one particle, should my getProperties add one
particle/value tuple for each value, or add a particle/collection tuple,
where the collection contains the values (to be unpacked by the
encoder)? Should these be equivalent?
The line in the binding is one of these:
properties.add(new Object[] { particle, value });
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Australian Resources Research Centre
26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
