Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Justin wrote (in a Jira comment): > > On a related note? How goes the work on the GML3 bindings in geotools? > > I am back working on it today. I have a working solution for the > substitution group problem, but I still have some odd behaviour for some > other complex properties. I need to confirm that the test objects are > built correctly, and perhaps tweak some of the bindings.
Justin, we had problems with incorrect object construction and binding problems. I now have the bindings (mostly) working. You will have received the Jira issues for the patches. Most are small and straightforward. The one of interest is SubstitutionGroupXSAnyTypeBinding (extends XSAnyTypeBinding), which adds support for the GML property type pattern. As you may recall, we discussed a few weeks ago whether this should be a patch to XSAnyTypeBinding or a standalone override. I have taken the second approach, to limit the scope of problems, but I am happy for this functionality to be pulled up into XSAnyTypeBinding if you prefer (and it does not break anything. You will also have a path attached to a Jira issue for enabling this override in in GeoServer v1_1_0 WFSConfiguration. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
