Hi Team: Just a heads up on the java-collab geometry stuff. I have sat through a couple different ways of playing: - do the osgeo labs thing (it looks like it will take a while - and is a bit more formal then we want) - work in the deegree svn - that would be fine; but everyone is away on holiday and it would take a while - work in a geotools spike directory
This is response to the goal of: - having an svn to play in - having osgeo copyright and package names - actually getting down to work (more splat less chat) I would like to extend this last option to java-collab (contributors would sign the geotools contributors agreement which will actually be a perfect fit. It mentions (c) OSGeo and the fact that the code would be contributed to a GeoTools server - it does not say much about the PMC (since the PMC only really steps up for supported work). I would like to ask if this use of the spike directory would be okay? This is a normal request on the level of an "unsupported" module - as such I need a +1 from one PMC member to ahead. As as a result of this I will go ahead and write a nice email to java-collab offering the above "spike/geometry" space to work in. I was going to leave the following options opetion to java-collab. Figuring out if the header should have contact details for GeoTools PMC and Deegree PSC; or if a subcomittee for "Geometry" should be mentioned in the header. Aside: I think I can continue to talk everyone through the annoying process stuff; but if anyone has experience loading content into svn (between repositories) I would *love* a volunteer. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
