Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Hi Team: > > Just a heads up on the java-collab geometry stuff. I have sat through > a couple different ways of playing: > - do the osgeo labs thing (it looks like it will take a while - and is > a bit more formal then we want) > - work in the deegree svn - that would be fine; but everyone is away > on holiday and it would take a while > - work in a geotools spike directory > > This is response to the goal of: > - having an svn to play in > - having osgeo copyright and package names > - actually getting down to work (more splat less chat) > > I would like to extend this last option to java-collab (contributors > would sign the geotools contributors agreement which will actually be > a perfect fit. It mentions (c) OSGeo and the fact that the code would > be contributed to a GeoTools server - it does not say much about the > PMC (since the PMC only really steps up for supported work). > > I would like to ask if this use of the spike directory would be okay? > This is a normal request on the level of an "unsupported" module - as > such I need a +1 from one PMC member to ahead.
Here is is, +1 > As as a result of this I will go ahead and write a nice email to > java-collab offering the above "spike/geometry" space to work in. I > was going to leave the following options opetion to java-collab. > Figuring out if the header should have contact details for GeoTools > PMC and Deegree PSC; or if a subcomittee for "Geometry" should be > mentioned in the header. Heh, that's a good question. I think it should be a third party commitee, if we need one, since the hope is to involve people from various other organisation besides GeoTools and Deegree. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
