On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jody Garnett<[email protected]> wrote: >>> - Some kind of grid coverage (image moasic?) work needs to be brought >>> forward to trunk from 2.5.x? Simone I think you are on this one ... >> >> I am porting it right now. There is one problem I foresee the changes >> that emily made a while ago to fiddle with the index. In my new scheme >> I am having an hard time to find a place for them, that is why I have >> been waiting this long. Some time from her myght be needed. >> I also want daniele to come up with a milestone for imageio-ext 1.1 >> that uses a newer version of gdal. >> > What do you mean by having a hard time to find a place for them? > Perhaps I do not know your new scheme :-) As I recall they just detect > a couple additional attributes in the moasic feature collection and > slap on some JAI operations?
On a practical side, I am not so happy about exposing the internal index to users so that they can play with it. On the less practical side, I am not entirely sure that we should let people do this kind of operations (band selection, color correction, etc...) inside the mosaic while it should rather be part of a processing step performed after loading. > > Emily do you have some to help with this? Or can we sort this out on > the email list and not interrupt your work? > > I have one more odd issue (that may be either for Simone on Andrea) - > have a look at the screen snaps here - > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/UDIG-1561 That is a series of > GridCoverages (coming out of a tile server) that have been passed to > the GeoTools renderer. Each individual grid coverage is being > rotated/resampled due to the change of projection - resulting in a > very cool effect. > > Simone is there any hope of sorting this out; or should we construct > an image moasic of the tiles and try and using that rendering pathway? > Andrea already caught us out using GridCoverageRenderer directly so we > may already be on the hook for a rewrite... What's happening, at least from a cursory look, seems normal to me since you are reprojecting the tiles individually. I'd rather first mosaic them and then reproject as a whole. I have a Mosaic operation on my todo list for GeoTools truunk, I guess this is a case where it would be handy. Ciao, Simone. > > Jody > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
