Hi all, nowadays Sextante is keeping various versions of the GeoTools/Sextante bindings in its own repository: they have a gt2.2.x version, a gt2.5.x version, a gt2.4.x version and a gt2.6.x version
I feel this is kind of wrong, imho the relationship should be othe other way around? I would also feel more comfortable maintaing those bindings in the gt2 code base. But there is a catch: Sextante license is GPL. So that would made those bindings GPL. License wise I would have a clean way out: keep the bindings in GeoServer, which is GPL'd as well. But it feels kind of stealing to GeoTools, such bindings make perfectly sense at the library level. Suggestions? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
