Can we negotiate for the binding to be made available as LGPL? Jody
On 04/09/2009, at 8:09 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > nowadays Sextante is keeping various versions of the GeoTools/Sextante > bindings in its own repository: they have a gt2.2.x version, a gt2.5.x > version, a gt2.4.x version and a gt2.6.x version > > I feel this is kind of wrong, imho the relationship should be othe > other way around? I would also feel more comfortable maintaing those > bindings in the gt2 code base. > > But there is a catch: Sextante license is GPL. So that would made > those > bindings GPL. > > License wise I would have a clean way out: keep the bindings in > GeoServer, which is GPL'd as well. But it feels kind of stealing > to GeoTools, such bindings make perfectly sense at the library level. > > Suggestions? > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
